<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proboscis Monkey (Nasalis larvatus)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailymammal.com/proboscis-monkey-nasalis-larvatus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailymammal.com/proboscis-monkey-nasalis-larvatus/</link>
	<description>5,000 Mammals, One Day at a Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Rae Atkins</title>
		<link>http://www.dailymammal.com/proboscis-monkey-nasalis-larvatus/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Rae Atkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailymammal.com/?p=234#comment-592</guid>
		<description>Good questions, Clare. I don&#039;t know of any affectionate naturalists, but surely there are some. I&#039;ll let you know if I run across any, and will you do the same for me?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m also not sure how to account for the harshness of their language. On the one hand, it&#039;s vivid to complement their drawings; they didn&#039;t have photos or films to share with us. But on the other hand, it would be possible to be vivid without calling the animals you&#039;re observing &quot;vile&quot; or &quot;horrible&quot;! It&#039;s so judgmental! Maybe it&#039;s all just wrapped up in romantic dichotomies of nature: wild/pure, scary/beautiful. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good questions, Clare. I don&#8217;t know of any affectionate naturalists, but surely there are some. I&#8217;ll let you know if I run across any, and will you do the same for me?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also not sure how to account for the harshness of their language. On the one hand, it&#8217;s vivid to complement their drawings; they didn&#8217;t have photos or films to share with us. But on the other hand, it would be possible to be vivid without calling the animals you&#8217;re observing &#8220;vile&#8221; or &#8220;horrible&#8221;! It&#8217;s so judgmental! Maybe it&#8217;s all just wrapped up in romantic dichotomies of nature: wild/pure, scary/beautiful. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare</title>
		<link>http://www.dailymammal.com/proboscis-monkey-nasalis-larvatus/comment-page-1/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailymammal.com/?p=234#comment-590</guid>
		<description>Early naturalists sometimes seem very unimpressed by the wonders of nature. Here&#039;s Mary Kingsley on gorillas:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;I have no hesitation in saying that the gorilla is the most horrible wild animal I have seen. I have seen at close quarters specimens of the most important big game of Central Africa and, with the exception of snakes, I have run away from all of them; but although elephants, leopards and pythons give you a feeling of alarm, they do not give that feeling of horrible disgust that an old gorilla gives on account of its hideousness of appearance.&quot; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Any thoughts on why they would see fit to be so harsh about God&#039;s creations? And are there any naturalists particularly known for their affection towards all creatures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early naturalists sometimes seem very unimpressed by the wonders of nature. Here&#8217;s Mary Kingsley on gorillas:</p>
<p>&#8220;I have no hesitation in saying that the gorilla is the most horrible wild animal I have seen. I have seen at close quarters specimens of the most important big game of Central Africa and, with the exception of snakes, I have run away from all of them; but although elephants, leopards and pythons give you a feeling of alarm, they do not give that feeling of horrible disgust that an old gorilla gives on account of its hideousness of appearance.&#8221; </p>
<p>Any thoughts on why they would see fit to be so harsh about God&#8217;s creations? And are there any naturalists particularly known for their affection towards all creatures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Rae Atkins</title>
		<link>http://www.dailymammal.com/proboscis-monkey-nasalis-larvatus/comment-page-1/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Rae Atkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailymammal.com/?p=234#comment-587</guid>
		<description>You mean William Jardine&#039;s, right? Isn&#039;t it, though? But also kind of cute in a way. Such a funny expression on his face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean William Jardine&#8217;s, right? Isn&#8217;t it, though? But also kind of cute in a way. Such a funny expression on his face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.dailymammal.com/proboscis-monkey-nasalis-larvatus/comment-page-1/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailymammal.com/?p=234#comment-586</guid>
		<description>That illustration is fantastically creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That illustration is fantastically creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
