<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Desert Shrew (Notiosorex crawfordi)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailymammal.com/desert-shrew-notiosorex-crawfordi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailymammal.com/desert-shrew-notiosorex-crawfordi/</link>
	<description>5,000 Mammals, One Day at a Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: L &#38;amp; J</title>
		<link>http://www.dailymammal.com/desert-shrew-notiosorex-crawfordi/comment-page-1/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>L &#38;amp; J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailymammal.com/?p=246#comment-611</guid>
		<description>very cool Hawaii animals and commentary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very cool Hawaii animals and commentary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.dailymammal.com/desert-shrew-notiosorex-crawfordi/comment-page-1/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailymammal.com/?p=246#comment-610</guid>
		<description>I imagine &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.eol.org/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EOL&lt;/a&gt; or such projects might eventually displace published tomes like &lt;i&gt;Walker&#039;s&lt;/i&gt;.  This would be sort of sad, but hopefully would mean that more people would access to accurate information about animals (&lt;i&gt;Walker&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; is EXPENSIVE!)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As to whether we will ever reach reach an absolute phylogenetic consensus? That&#039;s a very interesting question, but probably one that Christopher Taylor could answer much better than.   I do suspect that higher level relationships among mammals will settle down a bit in the near term.  In the long term of course, there&#039;s no telling when a new discovery or development of a new technique will require a major overhaul, that&#039;s the tragedy/beauty of science I suppose.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6503045.stm&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This supertree&lt;/a&gt; helps to put things in perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine <a HREF="http://www.eol.org/" REL="nofollow">EOL</a> or such projects might eventually displace published tomes like <i>Walker&#8217;s</i>.  This would be sort of sad, but hopefully would mean that more people would access to accurate information about animals (<i>Walker&#8217;s</i> is EXPENSIVE!)</p>
<p>As to whether we will ever reach reach an absolute phylogenetic consensus? That&#8217;s a very interesting question, but probably one that Christopher Taylor could answer much better than.   I do suspect that higher level relationships among mammals will settle down a bit in the near term.  In the long term of course, there&#8217;s no telling when a new discovery or development of a new technique will require a major overhaul, that&#8217;s the tragedy/beauty of science I suppose.</p>
<p><a HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6503045.stm" REL="nofollow">This supertree</a> helps to put things in perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Rae Atkins</title>
		<link>http://www.dailymammal.com/desert-shrew-notiosorex-crawfordi/comment-page-1/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Rae Atkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailymammal.com/?p=246#comment-609</guid>
		<description>Oh my goodness, it&#039;s even worse than I thought! Thanks for the update, Neil. No wonder &lt;i&gt;Walker&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; hasn&#039;t come out with a new edition. They should probably go with a pure online subscription model so they can keep it updated more easily. But I hope they don&#039;t. Do you think that as genetic studies progress it will all get finally sifted out and stop changing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my goodness, it&#8217;s even worse than I thought! Thanks for the update, Neil. No wonder <i>Walker&#8217;s</i> hasn&#8217;t come out with a new edition. They should probably go with a pure online subscription model so they can keep it updated more easily. But I hope they don&#8217;t. Do you think that as genetic studies progress it will all get finally sifted out and stop changing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.dailymammal.com/desert-shrew-notiosorex-crawfordi/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailymammal.com/?p=246#comment-608</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, &quot;Soricomorpha&quot; is now thought to be an unnatural group too as it excludes hedgehogs, which are (according to some genetic studies) more closely related to shrews than moles.  &quot;Eulipotyphla&quot; is the handy term used these days for &quot;true insectivores&quot; i.e. shrews, moles, hedgehogs, solenodons, moon rats, desmans and what not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, &#8220;Soricomorpha&#8221; is now thought to be an unnatural group too as it excludes hedgehogs, which are (according to some genetic studies) more closely related to shrews than moles.  &#8220;Eulipotyphla&#8221; is the handy term used these days for &#8220;true insectivores&#8221; i.e. shrews, moles, hedgehogs, solenodons, moon rats, desmans and what not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
